Most Likely (I hope) this will conclude my blogging about Parkinson. Up to #24, I posted whatever I felt was relevant to move towards recovery of Parkinson’s. After reading Dr. Janice Hadlock’s books (available for free to download at https://pdrecovery.org/) I got a much clearer understanding about this condition. I can only recommend anyone interested in trying to find recovery from Parkinson’s to read her books (best from beginning to the end). I realize that I am not just “done” with PD. I will have to keep cultivating my relationship with my “Invisible Friend” for the rest of my life. This is no hardship at all. It is actually very serene and quite amusing at times.
Neurotheology is a new discipline that will, as it evolves, be able to give us answers to many questions we might have wrestled with. Some answers I just recently have already found. I have written in the last Parkinson’s blogs how I learned from Dr. Janice Hadlock’s books to understand the primary cause of my type of Parkinson’s and managed to recover from it. An important factor is to be able to establish a dialogue with an “invisible friend” (rather than a monologue of compulsive rants). Dr. Hadlock emphasizes that it should be an invisible, not an imaginary friend. She also strongly recommends that one should not choose god to be this friend. Why, becomes clear from the research described below. My ten cents worth to this distinction is that god, as I understand it, is visible everywhere anyway. Once I managed to follow her advice, I was able to “flip the switch” with the result that the last and persistent remaining Parkinson symptoms disappeared instantly (details in the most recent Parkinson’s blog).
This Reflection should explain why some readers of previous reflections and musings occasionally scratched their heads, asking themselves how can one come to such conclusions, or be so cynical? Reading Dr. Janice Hadlock’s books, in particular Recovering from Parkinson’s and Stuck on Pause helped me not only to recover from Parkinson’s and switching off Pause, but also to understand my troubled “relationship” with the concept of a god. Rather than giving my own spin, I will paste what gives a proper neurological explanation of where in the brain the god concept can “reside” and what this means to our relationship with a god or religion:
Here begins the quote copied from the book Stuck on Pause
What happens in the brain when conversing with a Friend? From p. 62-65 in Stuck On Pause by Dr. Janice Hadlock, available for free to download at https://pdrecovery.org/
“In the early years of the 21st century, medical researchers in the field of neurotheology saw unexpected brain responses in people who were told to think about god during their brain scans. Different areas of the brain showed increased activity in different people. What type of god a person had determined which brain area(s) showed increased activity. 20)
For example, if a person’s god is a critical or vengeful god, then thinking about god brings about increased activity in the amygdala (the fear and rage centers on the left and right sides of the brain).
If a person’s god is presumed to be knowable through word-based study such as memorizing or quoting scriptures, then thinking about god increases activity in certain word-driven brain zones, such as the Broca’a area on the left side of the brain.
If a person’s god is feel-able and/or something one can physically resonate with, including causing the sensation of expansion in the heart/ pericardium, then thinking about god increases activity in the brain’s thalamus, tucked inside the striatum. The thalamus processes somatic feelings (awareness of sensations inside the body) and regulates how and where we sense that we physically exist.
If a person’s god is someone or something with whom the person can enjoy loving, mutual, thought- and/or word-based communication, then thinking of god increases activity in the brain’s striatum. 21)
The neurotheology research project described in How God Changes Your Brain, cited below, started out as a search for where the idea of god was located in the brain. The discovery that god wasn’t located in one place in the brain, but that different types of god activated different locations was actually more intriguing than just finding a brain location for god.
It appears that word-based communication with an unseen anyone, remembered or fictional, who is unconditionally loving, will have the same benefit to the striatum. This brings us to the subject of the new, twenty-first century understanding of the benefits of a parasocial relationship.”
20) How God Changes Your Brain, Andrew Newberg, M.D., Ballantine Books, 2010, Chapter 3. Some of his other books are Why We Believe What We Believe, Words Can Change Your Brain, Why God Won’t Go Away, and The Metaphysical Mind: Probing the Biology of Philosophical Thought.
21) For an example of further confirmation of the relationship between loving, word-based communication and the striatum, research done in 2019 used brain scans to show which brain areas are activated in children when they are being read to, as opposed to when children use computers or other “screen” devices for self-amusement. While books are read out loud to children – a type of loving, word-based communication, the children’s brains’ striatums become highly activated. This finding is from a study done by the Reading and Literacy Discovery Center of Cincinnati’s Children’s Hospital. “This is your child’s brain on books: Scans show benefit of reading vs. screen time”; CNN Health, Sandee LaMotte; Jan 16, 2020; http://www.cnn.com;2020/01016/health/child-brain- readubg-book-wellness/index.html .
Here ends the copied quote
The understanding I gleaned from reading about this research also gave me some insight into how a difference may be experienced between toxic and healing religion. When the fear and rage centers on the left and right sides of the brain are activated, the teaching or relationship may become toxic. When the thinking about god increases activity in the brain’s thalamus, tucked inside the striatum, the teaching or relationship can be healing.
In my Theological Musings which also contain critical reflections and cynical rants it can be easy to tell if I talk about the toxic version or the healing relation. At least it is now clear for me. With this new shift, my future contributions will very likely become more differentiated – hopefully for the better.